METHODS We disaggregated men with prostate adenocarcinoma from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2017 by Answers of all participants on the topic of general scientific publishing. However, this benefit comes with the cost of short- and long-term side effects that may negatively affect patients' quality of life (QoL) and WebSymptoms of ED include. For example, Sustainability published a total of 7,414 articles in 2019, with peer-review periods of between 13.94 and 17.75days from submission to first review, while Vaccines published 226 articles in 2019 with peer-review periods ranging between 14.61 and 26.04days. Here, social media as well as conference proceedings should address this problem as well as help in the identification of predatory journals to ensure an increase in awareness. Besides, data were collected from JCR (2018) on the Journal Impact Factor and the Impact Factor Without Self Cites. The present survey highlights the need for more educational initiatives to inform scientists on the particular problem of predatory journals and especially how to identify them and avoid the submission. Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Translational Lung Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Heidelberg, Germany, 8 We aimed to evaluate the association of impaired nutrition with psychological health and quality of life among older adults with advanced cancer who were starting cancer treatment with palliative intent. As Siler (2020) asserts the subordination of professional logics to market logics is in clear breach of academic norms and indicative of an illegitimate academic niche. 2019), data show analysed journals have a completely different pattern in this matter when compared with leading journals in the category. A review of APCs for the leading journal control group was not conducted. being able to get an erection, but not having it last long enough for sex. The process of journal identification, inclusion, and exclusions within each study group is outlined in Fig. ED is often a symptom of another health problem or health-related factor. A further relevant aspect worth focussing upon is the size of the Journal Editorial Board. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the Further research would be needed to understand how these faster times are achieved. For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription. In this online survey, each questionnaire item had to be answered in order to proceed to the next question. This may suggest a form of post-production misconduct, due to the manipulation of citations, which affects the impact factor of the journal, its visibility and its influence. Moreover, indexing in PubMed was a major criterion in the present survey for scientists to choose a journal for publication of their scientific work. The librarian, Jeffrey Beall, while at the University of Colorado and now in retirement, coined the term to identify journals that, overlooking quality peer-review processes, seek to generate income exclusively through the APCs that the authors are expected to pay and who are then sent misleading information on citation indexes and spam-related marketing (Beall 2012; Laine and Winker 2017). This investigation has approached the study of MDPI-journals that are ranked in the 2019 edition of JCR. Certainly, the number of special issues published or scheduled in 1 year reveals no quality-related information, although the fact that the number of special issues in JCR-indexed MDPI-journals is so much higher than the number of ordinary issues per year coupled with their constant increase since 2018 inevitably awakens suspicions of a lucrative business aim. Systemic therapies for GC, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, have evolved significantly in the past few years. Cancers. Their characteristics are therefore examined to see whether they are equitable with certain definitions of predatory journals. Contributors: All authors contributed to the study designs and acquirement of data. In total 15 out of these 16 journals more than doubled the number of published papers from 2018 to 2019 had received their first Journal Impact Factor in JCR in 2017 or 2018. The Editor Ethics 2.0 Code (https://editorethics.uncc.edu/editor-ethics-2-0-code/) sets out an explicit ban on this malpractice in the fields of Industrial/Organizational Psychology and Management. Besides, an increasingly high rate of citations from other MDPI-journals was observed. However, the participants responding to the survey were mainly from an academic background, in theory very much aware of the problem and precautious of predatory journals. Received 2019 Aug 26; Revised 2019 Sep 30; Accepted 2019 Oct 1. WebJournal of Personalized Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on personalized medicine, published monthly online by MDPI. (5) Indexing: Since indexing provides some quality checks, is the journal indexed in several internationally known databases? Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. In spite of its important role in science, it was considered too subjective an aspectpartly because, as with journal quality and deceitfulness, it is impossible to assess(Grudniewicz et al. Importantly, the peer-review process is the most important factor to ensure scientific integrity and cannot be assessed externally since the peer-review reports are not made public.12 Only approximately half of the participants indicated a missing impact factor as a hallmark of a predatory journal. For No hard and fast answer possible (1). Furthermore, the low variability of timeframes for peer review regardless of the scope of the journal, the size of its editorial board and the volume of published articles all raise questions over the levels of quality assurance required from a legitimate journal/publisher. ED is often a symptom of another health problem or health-related factor. Predatory journals usually offer rapid peer-review processes, but without experts reviewing the quality of research and accuracy of the information (Oerman et al. Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. It should be pointed out that, despite the significant advance in the definition proposed by Grudniewicz et al. The revision times of the 53 journals under analysis were surprisingly similar, regardless of the high variability of the articles published in each journal in 2019 and were, in many cases, very much shorter than time spans that may be considered normal. (2) Emails: Is there any aggressive email policy in place to attract new submissions? (2019) and COPE (2019). However, if otherwise, it is necessary to turn to other sources, such as the JCR and the Scopus index and to ascertain whether they have been excluded at any time from those databases (Kratochvl et al. Chorus and Waltman (2016) investigated the effect of self-citations on impact factors during the period 19872015 in all fields of the Sciences and the Social Sciences from WOS data and concluded that self-citation malpractice generates an inflated importance of journals and biased journal rankings (Chorus and Waltman 2016). no experience (1), nothing (3),~1000 (1), dont care (1). As the above results show, the review periods for all JCR-indexed MDPI-journals are similar and are commonly shorter than considered normal, despite the variation in number of published articles and themes. In 2019, almost all 53 MDPI-journals under analysis had intra-MDPI citation rates well above 20% (all except Universe11.87% and Catalysts18.73%), reaching values as high as 56.94% in Electronics, 51.07% in the IJGI, 47.56% in Remote Sensing, and 46.55% in Sustainability (Table 3). 2020). The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) released the Principles of Transparency and Best Practices in Scholarly Publishing (last version published 15 January 2018) together with the Directory of Open-Access Journals (DOAJ), the Open-Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). A two-sided alpha level below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. being able to get an erection, but not having it last long enough for sex. It is therefore essential to define the concept not to solely rely on specific criteria. being able to get an erection, but not having it last long enough for sex. By 2019, 106,152 articles had been published in its 218 journals, an increase of 64.1% over 2018. For example, they no longer have webs with typographic errors, but with a much more sophisticated appearance, converting themselves into a non-evident/hidden predatory publisher, in view of their editorial behaviour. 2019). Logically, this step requires expert knowledge in each scientific field that prevents a global analysis of the 53 journals under analysis. Disclaimer: Any views, opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those solely of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of ESMO or Roche. Ramn y Cajal. In this survey, we could demonstrate that over one-third of the participating scientist in Austria and Germany are not aware of the predatory journal problem, although almost all participants indicated that they are actively read scientific articles. With regard to solicited paper submissions by email campaigning, 142 (75.5%) participants had received 1150 email invitations to publish per month (n=60, 42.3%). This is an especially important aspect when the external appearance of the predatory journals, such as the OMICS journals, has reached such a level of sophistication that they totally or partially comply with the formal criteria that serve to differentiate between predatory and legitimate journals. 2018) with all the consequences that may entail, not only at a scientific but at a social level. WebJournals. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, any changes made are indicated, and the use is non-commercial. With this in mind, talk with your doctor about what types of cancer screening may be appropriate for you. Read the latest JID Viewpoints below. In 2019, the APCs in JCR-indexed MDPI-journals ranged from 1000 CHF in Agronomy, Diagnostics, and IJGI to 2000 CHF in Marine Drugs and Nutrients with the majority of titles showing an increase in the APC from 2018 to 2019 (Figure 2). This journal offers an open access platform to the authors to publish their research outcome and thus help in promoting Cancer and Oncology research. Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. 2020b). *, n (%) (n=169), Are you listed as Corresponding-Author in one of your publication? The increase in the number of published articles between 2018 and 2019 ranged from 554.91% in Medicina to 18.3% in the ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information (IJGI). The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2019) clarified that predatory publishing generally refers to the systematic for-profit publication of purportedly scholarly content (in journals and articles, monographs, books, or conference proceedings) in a deceptive or fraudulent way and without any regard for quality assurance [ so] these journals exist solely for profit without any commitment to publication ethics or integrity of any kind. No longer merely a medium for dissemination, scientific journals are now a key foundation for appointments and funding in scientific research (Shu et al. (, Forero D. A., Oermann M. H., Manca A., Deriu F., Mendieta-Zern H., Dadkhah M., Bhad R., Deshpande S. N., Wang W., Cifuentes M. P. (, Grudniewicz A., Moher D., Cobey K. D., Bryson, G. L., Cukier, S., Allen, K., Arden, C., Balcom, L., Barros, T., Berger, M., Buitrago Ciro, J., Cugusi, L., Donaldson, M. R., Matthias, E., Graham, I. D., Hodgkinson, M., Khan, K. M., Mabizela, M., Manca, A., Milzow, K., Mouton, J., Muchenje, M., Olijhoek, T., Ommaya, A., Patwardhan, B., Poff, D., Proulx, L., Rodger, M., Severin, A., Strinzel, M., Sylos-Labini, M., Tamblyn, R., van Niekerk, M., Wicherts, J.M., Lalu, G. M. (, Kratochvl J., Plch L., Sebera M., Korikov E. (, Manca A., Cugusi L., Cortegiani A., Ingoglia G., Moher D., Deriu F. (, Manca A., Martinez G., Cugusi L., Dragone D., Dvir Z., Deiru F. (, Manca A., Moher D., Cugusi L., Dvir Z., Deriu F. (, Moher D., Shamseer L., Cobey K. D., Lalu, M. M., Galipeau, J., Avey, M. T., Ahmadzai, N., Alabousi M., Barbeau, P. Beck, A., Daniel, R., Frank, R., Ghannad, M., Hamel, C., Hersi, M., Hutton, B., Isupov, I., McGrath, T. A., McInnes, M. D. F., Page, M. J., Pratt, M., Pussegoda, K., Shea, B., Srivastava, A., Stevens, A., Thavorn, K., van Katwyk, S., Ward, R., Wolfe, D., Yazdi, F., Yu, A. M., Ziai, H. (, Oerman M. H., Nicoll L. H., Ashton K. S., Edie, A. H., Amarasekara, S., Chinn, P. L., Carter-Templeton, H., Ledbetter, L. S. (, Shamseer L., Moher D., Maduekwe O. Turner, L., Barbour, V., Burch, R., Clark, J., Galipeau, J., Roberts, J., Shea, B. J. The survey was online from 1 October 2018 to 30 April 2019. This journal supports open access. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. (, Shu F., Mongeon P., Haustein S., Siler K., Alperin J. P., Larivire V. (, Xia J., Harmon J. L., Connolly K. G., Donnelly R. M., Anderson M. R., Howard H. A. Economics and Business Management Faculty, Business Management and Marketing Department, University of Seville, Avda. This analysis of the practices of MDPI is of relevance to researchers and for research institutions and funding bodies as well as for JCR itself, which could see its prestige compromised, if it incorporated predatory journals among its indexed journals. (2020) highlight, publishers could not explain not following best practices since there are settled by the industry principles for transparency and best practices in scholarly publishing. Data were collected between 2 December 2019 and 4 January 2020. As an approximation and with the limitations that it might imply in general terms, that time can be evaluated by comparing it with the review metrics from Nature Research 2019 (https://www.nature.com/nature-research/about/journal-metrics), which show that the average number of days from submission to acceptance fluctuated between 81days (Nature Structural and Molecular Biology) and 258days (Nature Neuroscience). Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory Overall approximately 5150 members were contacted via email although several members of the AIO and the DGHO are overlapping. However, this fact only partially could explain the notable increase in output content for just 43.39% of 53-MDPI journals received their first impact factor in 2017 or in 2018 while the increase in output content is observed for the all 53-MDPI journals. In particular, the 400 or so conferences that MDPI sponsored in 2019 (MDPI 2020) should all be carefully scrutinized. However, identification of predatory journals and especially standardised approaches to classify predatory journals as such are only infrequently used and not well known, highlighting the need to provide more educational campaigns on the problems and challenges of predatory journals practices in the field of oncology. Due to the breadth of MDPI journals assessed in this paper it was not possible to conduct in-depth work to compare each journal. Focussing our attention on the 53 MDPI-journals under analysis, 84.9% of their websites reported that they provided a first decision within <19days.
Travel Sterile Processing Jobs In Hawaii,
Digikull Pay After Placement,
Articles J